In my experience, both liberals, progressives, and so-called
conservatives give lip service to the Ten Commandments. But even though many of
the most fervent and dedicated so-called conservatives say they honor the Ten
Commandments and try to live by them, they really don’t. While liberals and progressives who don’t
talk much about the Commandments, actually live them a bit more that do the
so-called conservatives.
That’s because liberals and progressives have internalized
the Ten Commandments more than their vociferous so-called conservative brethren
and tend to see the Commandments in both/and terms, as both narrowly and
legalistically meant to govern our outer physical behavior, and as guides to both
our outer physical behavior and our inner thoughts feelings and behaviors - as guides
for getting our bloated nothingness out of the way of the divine circuits.
For example, the Commandments as guides to both inner and
outer: we might not often be inclined to covet other people’s possessions, but
do we compare our lives to theirs, sitting in judgment over the
differences? Yes, of course we do; at
least I do, constantly.
Another example:
Killing another person seems abhorrent, even when done in our names by
the state, but what about when we have extinguished hope, enthusiasm, or
opportunity—which seems to be the point of large chunks of contemporary Republican
policies aimed at large segments of the population?
The Ten Commandments may thus be seen to have both an inner
metaphysical meaning and an outer physical meaning. While the narrow, physical, legalistic
interpretation of the Ten Commandments would not seem to be violated by much of
contemporary Republican policies and politics, what about the spirit, intent
and metaphysics of the Commandments? How well do the policies and politics of
contemporary Republicans reflect the spirit, intent and metaphysics of the
Commandments?
No comments:
Post a Comment